Current:Home > MyFederal judge again strikes down California law banning high capacity gun magazines -FutureWise Finance
Federal judge again strikes down California law banning high capacity gun magazines
View
Date:2025-04-15 22:50:54
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California cannot ban gun owners from having detachable magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, a federal judge ruled Friday.
The ruling from U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez is likely not the final decision in this case. Benitez said his ruling will not take effect for 10 days, giving state Attorney General Rob Bonta enough time to appeal the decision.
This is the second time Benitez has truck down California’s law banning high-capacity magazines. The first time he struck it down — way back in 2017 — an appeals court ended up reversing his decision.
But last year, the U.S. Supreme Court set a new standard for how to interpret the nation’s gun laws. The new standard relies more on the historical tradition of gun regulation rather than public interests, including safety.
The Supreme Court ordered the case to be heard again in light of the new standards. It’s one of three high-profile challenges to California gun laws that are getting new hearings in court. The other two cases challenge California laws banning assault-style weapons and limiting purchases of ammunition.
Benitez ruled “there is no American tradition of limiting ammunition capacity.” He said detachable magazines “solved a problem with historic firearms: running out of ammunition and having to slowly reload a gun.”
“There have been, and there will be, times where many more than 10 rounds are needed to stop attackers,” Benitez wrote. “Yet, under this statute, the State says ‘too bad.’”
California Attorney General Rob Bonta argued magazines larger than 10 rounds “are not necessary or even suitable to engage in private self-defense.”
Chuck Michel, president of the California Rifle and Pistol Association, praised Benitez for a “thoughtful and in-depth approach.”
“Sure, the state will appeal, but the clock is ticking on laws that violate the Constitution,” Michel said.
veryGood! (7)
Related
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- When women stopped coding (Classic)
- How the cookie became a monster
- Twitter has lost 50 of its top 100 advertisers since Elon Musk took over, report says
- Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
- Karaoke night is coming to Apple Music, the company says
- How documentary-style films turn conspiracy theories into a call to action
- Delilah Belle Hamlin Shares What’s in Her Bag, Including Some Viral Favorites
- What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
- Facebook parent Meta is having a no-good, horrible day after dismal earnings report
Ranking
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- FTX investors fear they lost everything, and wonder if there's anything they can do
- Elon Musk expected to begin mass Twitter layoffs
- Elon Musk's backers cheer him on, even if they aren't sure what he's doing to Twitter
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- Son of El Chapo and Sinaloa cartel members hit with U.S. sanctions over fentanyl trafficking
- How the cookie became a monster
- Researchers name butterfly species after Lord of the Rings villain Sauron
Recommendation
Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
The Game Awards 2022: The full list of winners
More than 200 dead after Congo floods, with many more missing, officials say
Hubble's 1995 image of a star nursery was amazing. Take a look at NASA's new version
This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
How protesters in China bypass online censorship to express dissent
The FBI alleges TikTok poses national security concerns
Elon Musk takes control of Twitter and immediately ousts top executives